On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 08:55:28PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:okï
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Can you please stick to the original format rather than removing the
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.txt | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.txt
index 3182126..bb6e7f1 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.txt
@@ -1,11 +1,14 @@
Rockchip PWM controller
Required properties:
- - compatible: should be "rockchip,rk2928-pwm"
- - reg: physical base address and length of the controller's registers
- - clocks: phandle and clock specifier of the PWM reference clock
- - #pwm-cells: should be 2. See pwm.txt in this directory for a
- description of the cell format.
space in the first column? It makes it difficult to see what's being
changed by this patch.
Seems reasonable.+- compatible: should be "rockchip,<name>-pwm"should be one of following:I think it should be either 'should be "rockchip,<name>-pwm"' or 'should
be one of the following', not both.
the SoC rk3036 is newer than rk3288. Maybe I will remove the rk3036.
+ "rockchip,rk2928-pwm" - support the old version PWM for RK29xx,RK3066,RK3188 SoCs."old version PWM" and "new version PWM" can be dropped. Maybe:
+ "rockchip,rk3288-pwm" - support the new version PWM for RK3036,RK3288 SoCs.
+ "rockchip,vop-pwm" - support rockchip integrated VOP-PWM for RK32 SoCs.
"rockchip,rk2928-pwm": found on RK29xx, RK3066 and RK3188 SoCs
"rockchip,rk3288-pwm": found on RK3036 and RK3288 SoCs
"rockchip,vop-pwm": found integrated in VOP on RK32xx SoCs
? Could you explain a little what this VOP is? Also since the above says
that "rockchip,rk3288-pwm" is supported on RK3036, the compatible value
should really be "rockchip,rk3036-pwm" since we usually list the chip
that an IP block was first used in (I'm assuming here that RK3036 is
older than RK3288).
I will fix this and the other issuses in v3,thanks.+- reg: physical base address and length of the controller's registers.These are all unchanged (except for the first column's space being
+- clocks: phandle and clock specifier of the PWM reference clock.
+- #pwm-cells: should be 2. See pwm.txt in this directory for a
+ description of the cell format.
removed and the full-stops for reg and clocks properties). Please keep
with the original formatting so that it becomes obvious what the patch
changes.
Thierry