Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] acerhdf: Adding support for new models
From: Peter Feuerer
Date: Fri Jul 18 2014 - 12:07:04 EST
Borislav Petkov writes:
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 07:59:22PM +0200, Peter Feuerer wrote:
added following new models:
* Aspire 5755G
* AO521
* AO751h
* Aspire One 753
* Extensa 5420
* Aspire 5315
* Aspire 5739G
* TravelMate TM8573T
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andreas Mohr <andi@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Feuerer <peter@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c b/drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c
index dd63e93..176edbd 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
*/
#undef START_IN_KERNEL_MODE
-#define DRV_VER "0.5.29"
+#define DRV_VER "0.5.30"
What's the logic here, increment second minor version number after each
change?
Everytime I send out a modified version of acerhdf.c to someone in the
internet for trying out some changes, I increment the second minor version
number. And from time to time I push things to Mainline, then I need to
catch up with the numbering ;)
The major 0 is just from the ages, when all cool projects used to have a
0 in front.
Maybe it would be a good idea to go for 1.0 when I implemented a better
handling for the huge bios table.
--
--peter;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/