Re: [PATCH 1/1] [SCSI] Fix a bug in deriving the FLUSH_TIMEOUT from the basic I/O timeout

[Christoph Hellwig (hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)]

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:51:06AM +0000, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote:
> SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (16) should be favored over SYNCHRONIZE 
> CACHE (10) unless SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (10) is not supported.

I gues you mean (16) for the last occurance?  What's the benefit of
using SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (16) if we don't pass a LBA range?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/