[PATCH 2/2] sched: fix static_key race with sched_feat

From: Jason Baron
Date: Wed Jul 02 2014 - 11:52:52 EST


As pointed out by Andi Kleen, the usage of static keys can be racy in
sched_feat_disable() vs. sched_feat_enable(). Currently, we first check the
value of keys->enabled, and subsequently update the branch direction. This,
can be racy and can potentially leave the keys in an inconsistent state.

Take the i_mutex around these calls to resolve the race.

Reported-by: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 3bdf01b..249c865 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ sched_feat_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
char buf[64];
char *cmp;
int i;
+ struct inode *inode;

if (cnt > 63)
cnt = 63;
@@ -253,7 +254,11 @@ sched_feat_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
buf[cnt] = 0;
cmp = strstrip(buf);

+ /* Ensure the static_key remains in a consistent state */
+ inode = file_inode(filp);
+ mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
i = sched_feat_set(cmp);
+ mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
if (i == __SCHED_FEAT_NR)
return -EINVAL;

--
1.8.2.rc2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/