Re: mm: slub: invalid memory access in setup_object

[Christoph Lameter]

On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote:

> Is there a better way to stress test slub?

The typical way to test is by stressing the network subsystem
with small packets that require small allocations. Or do a filesystem
test that requires lots of metadata (file creations, removal, renames
etc).

But I also posted some in kernel benchmarks a while back

https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/13/459

Pekka had a project going to get these merged.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/29/17


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/