[PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp_scu: Used defined value instead of literal constant

From: Gregory CLEMENT
Date: Thu Jun 26 2014 - 18:45:12 EST


The first bit of the SCU control register is actually the enable
it. So let's name it instead of using literal constant.

Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c
index 1aafa0d785eb..cfea41b41ad0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <asm/cputype.h>

#define SCU_CTRL 0x00
+#define SCU_CTRL_ENABLE BIT(1)
#define SCU_CONFIG 0x04
#define SCU_CPU_STATUS 0x08
#define SCU_INVALIDATE 0x0c
@@ -43,17 +44,18 @@ void scu_enable(void __iomem *scu_base)
/* Cortex-A9 only */
if ((read_cpuid_id() & 0xff0ffff0) == 0x410fc090) {
scu_ctrl = readl_relaxed(scu_base + 0x30);
- if (!(scu_ctrl & 1))
- writel_relaxed(scu_ctrl | 0x1, scu_base + 0x30);
+ if (!(scu_ctrl & SCU_CTRL_ENABLE))
+ writel_relaxed(scu_ctrl | SCU_CTRL_ENABLE,
+ scu_base + 0x30);
}
#endif

scu_ctrl = readl_relaxed(scu_base + SCU_CTRL);
/* already enabled? */
- if (scu_ctrl & 1)
+ if (scu_ctrl & SCU_CTRL_ENABLE)
return;

- scu_ctrl |= 1;
+ scu_ctrl |= SCU_CTRL_ENABLE;
writel_relaxed(scu_ctrl, scu_base + SCU_CTRL);

/*
--
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/