Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Fix compiler warnings

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Wed Jun 25 2014 - 23:28:25 EST


On 06/25/2014 05:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Guenter,

[I know I'm a bit late to this, but ...]

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:05:29 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
index 9d85318..e35d880 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
cpu_topology[cpuid].socket_id, mpidr);
}

-static inline const int cpu_corepower_flags(void)
+static inline int cpu_corepower_flags(void)
{
return SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN;
}

The only reference to this function is to take its address, so "inline"
is useless, right?

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 306f4f0..0376b05 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -872,21 +872,21 @@ enum cpu_idle_type {
#define SD_NUMA 0x4000 /* cross-node balancing */

#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
-static inline const int cpu_smt_flags(void)
+static inline int cpu_smt_flags(void)
{
return SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY | SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES;
}
#endif

#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
-static inline const int cpu_core_flags(void)
+static inline int cpu_core_flags(void)
{
return SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES;
}
#endif

#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-static inline const int cpu_numa_flags(void)
+static inline int cpu_numa_flags(void)
{
return SD_NUMA;
}

The same is true of those three, but then they would have to be moved
into a .c file and replaced with prototypes ...


Personally I wasn't sure why it had to be functions instead of defines,
but who knows. Anyway, seems others are not happy with my proposed fix
either, and everyone seems to suggest a different solution, so I guess
it won't go anywhere.

I "solved" my immediate problem of getting a polluted build log by
filtering the warnings out, so I don't really care too much anymore ;-).

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/