Re: [PATCH_v4 0/2] arm64: Add seccomp support

[AKASHI Takahiro]

On 06/25/2014 11:53 PM, Mark Salter wrote:
> What is the current status of this patch series? Is it on track
> for 3.17?

I assume not as I saw no comments on this so far.
But I will re-post a new version soon or later due to recent changes on seccomp.

-Takahiro AKASHI

> On Sat, 2014-03-15 at 14:50 +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > (Please apply this patch after my ftrace patch and audit patch in order
> > to avoid some conflict on arm64/Kconfig.)
> >
> > This patch enables secure computing (system call filtering) on arm64.
> > System calls can be allowed or denied by loaded bpf-style rules.
> > Architecture specific part is to run secure_computing() on syscall entry
> > and check the result. See [2/2]
> >
> > Prerequisites are:
> >   * "arm64: make a single hook to syscall_trace() for all syscall features" patch
> >   * "arm64: split syscall_trace() into separate functions for enter/exit" patch
> >   * "arm64: Add audit support" patch
> >   * "arm64: is_compat_task is defined both in asm/compat.h and
> >      linux/compat.h" patch
> >
> > This code is tested on ARMv8 fast model using libseccomp v2.1.1 with
> > modifications for arm64 and verified by its "live" tests, 20, 21 and 24.
> >
> > Changes v3 -> v4:
> > * removed the following patch and moved it to "arm64: prerequisites for
> >    audit and ftrace" patchset since it is required for audit and ftrace in
> >    case of !COMPAT, too.
> >    "arm64: is_compat_task is defined both in asm/compat.h and linux/compat.h"
> >
> > Changes v2 -> v3:
> > * removed unnecessary 'type cast' operations [2/3]
> > * check for a return value (-1) of secure_computing() explicitly [2/3]
> > * aligned with the patch, "arm64: split syscall_trace() into separate
> >    functions for enter/exit" [2/3]
> > * changed default of CONFIG_SECCOMP to n [2/3]
> >
> > Changes v1 -> v2:
> > * added generic seccomp.h for arm64 to utilize it [1,2/3]
> > * changed syscall_trace() to return more meaningful value (-EPERM)
> >    on seccomp failure case [2/3]
> > * aligned with the change in "arm64: make a single hook to syscall_trace()
> >    for all syscall features" v2 [2/3]
> > * removed is_compat_task() definition from compat.h [3/3]
> >
> > AKASHI Takahiro (2):
> >    asm-generic: Add generic seccomp.h for secure computing mode 1
> >    arm64: Add seccomp support
> >
> >   arch/arm64/Kconfig               | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >   arch/arm64/include/asm/seccomp.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h  |  3 +++
> >   arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S        |  4 ++++
> >   arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c       |  6 ++++++
> >   include/asm-generic/seccomp.h    | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   6 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/seccomp.h
> >   create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/seccomp.h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/