[PATCH 3.8 46/65] sched/deadline: Change sched_getparam() behaviour vs SCHED_DEADLINE

From: Kamal Mostafa
Date: Tue Jun 24 2014 - 16:32:22 EST


3.8.13.25 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit ce5f7f8200ca2504f6f290044393d73ca314965a upstream.

The way we read POSIX one should only call sched_getparam() when
sched_getscheduler() returns either SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR.

Given that we currently return sched_param::sched_priority=0 for all
others, extend the same behaviour to SCHED_DEADLINE.

Requested-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-man <linux-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140512205034.GH13467@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ kamal: backport to 3.8-stable: context ]
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 5e2f7c3..8188769 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4039,7 +4039,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(sched_getscheduler, pid_t, pid)
*/
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(sched_getparam, pid_t, pid, struct sched_param __user *, param)
{
- struct sched_param lp;
+ struct sched_param lp = { .sched_priority = 0 };
struct task_struct *p;
int retval;

@@ -4056,7 +4056,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(sched_getparam, pid_t, pid, struct sched_param __user *, param)
if (retval)
goto out_unlock;

- lp.sched_priority = p->rt_priority;
+ if (task_has_rt_policy(p))
+ lp.sched_priority = p->rt_priority;
rcu_read_unlock();

/*
--
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/