Re: [PATCH 2/6] OF: Add [__]of_find_node_by_full_name

From: Grant Likely
Date: Tue Jun 24 2014 - 09:55:47 EST


On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:00:39 +0300, Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On Jun 23, 2014, at 8:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > On 06/22/2014 02:40 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> __of_find_node_by_full_name recursively searches for a matching node
> >> with the given full name without taking any locks.
> >>
> >> of_find_node_by_full_name takes locks and takes a reference on the
> >> matching node.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/of/base.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> include/linux/of.h | 4 ++++
> >> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> >> index d3493e1..80fef33 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> >> @@ -1201,6 +1201,64 @@ static void *of_find_property_value_of_size(const struct device_node *np,
> >> }
> >>
> >> /**
> >> + * __of_find_node_by_full_name - Find a node with the full name recursively
> >> + * @node: Root of the tree to perform the search
> >> + * @full_name: Full name of the node to find.
> >> + *
> >> + * Find a node with the give full name by recursively following any of
> >> + * the child node links.
> >> + * Returns the matching node, or NULL if not found.
> >> + * Note that the devtree lock is not taken, so this function is only
> >> + * safe to call on either detached trees, or when devtree lock is already
> >> + * taken.
> >> + */
> >> +struct device_node *__of_find_node_by_full_name(struct device_node *node,
> >> + const char *full_name)
> >> +{
> >> + struct device_node *child, *found;
> >> +
> >> + if (node == NULL)
> >> + return NULL;
> >> +
> >> + /* check */
> >> + if (of_node_cmp(node->full_name, full_name) == 0)
> >> + return node;
> >> +
> >> + __for_each_child_of_node(node, child) {
> >> + found = __of_find_node_by_full_name(child, full_name);
> >> + if (found != NULL)
> >> + return found;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return NULL;
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__of_find_node_by_full_name);
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * of_find_node_by_full_name - Find a node with the full name recursively
> >> + * @node: Root of the tree to perform the search
> >> + * @full_name: Full name of the node to find.
> >> + *
> >> + * Find a node with the give full name by recursively following any of
> >> + * the child node links.
> >> + * Returns the matching node (with a ref taken), or NULL if not found.
> >> + */
> >> +struct device_node *of_find_node_by_full_name(struct device_node *node,
> >> + const char *full_name)
> >> +{
> >> + unsigned long flags;
> >> + struct device_node *np;
> >> +
> >> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&devtree_lock, flags);
> >> + np = of_find_node_by_full_name(node, full_name);
> >
> > Should this be __of_find_node_by_full_name, or am I missing something ?
> >
>
> Ugh, you're not missing something. This slipped through since this is not
> used in the current code

Then perhaps the function shouldn't exist at all.

g.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/