Re: [PATCH 3/10] video: use safer test on the result of find_first_zero_bit

From: Tomi Valkeinen
Date: Tue Jun 24 2014 - 03:56:27 EST


On 23/06/14 17:12, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>
>> On 04/06/14 12:07, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Find_first_zero_bit considers BITS_PER_LONG bits at a time, and thus may
>>> return a larger number than the maximum position argument if that position
>>> is not a multiple of BITS_PER_LONG.
>>
>> Thanks, queued for 3.17.
>
> No, sorry you can drop it. It doesn't hurt anything, but it is not
> necessary either. Returning a larger number is actually not possible.

Ok, dropped.

Tomi


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature