Re: [PATCH] block: flush queued bios when the process blocks

From: Kent Overstreet
Date: Tue May 27 2014 - 16:06:48 EST


On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 03:56:00PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 27 May 2014, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > On 2014-05-27 10:26, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 May 2014, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 2014-05-27 09:23, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The patch adds bio list flushing to the scheduler just besides plug
> > > > > flushsing.
> > > >
> > > > ... which is exactly why I'm commenting. It'd be great to avoid yet one
> > > > more
> > > > scheduler hook for this sort of thing.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jens Axboe
> > >
> > > One could create something like schedule notifier chain, but I'm not sure
> > > if it is worth the complexity because of just two users. If more users
> > > come in the future, it could be generalized.
> >
> > Except such a thing already exists, there are unplug callback chains. All I'm
> > asking is that you look into how feasible it would be to use something like
> > that, instead of reinventing the wheel.
> >
> > --
> > Jens Axboe
>
> Do you mean moving current->bio_list to struct blk_plug and calling
> blk_start_plug/blk_finish_plug around generic_make_request?
>
> It would be possible on a condition that we can redirect all bios to a
> workqueue (i.e. eliminate bio_kmalloc and always use bio_alloc_bioset).
>
> What are performance implications of this - does it make sense to have
> blk_start_plug/blk_finish_plug around every call to generic_make_request?
> - that means that all i/o requests will be added to a plug and then
> unplugged.

We've already got blk_start_plug() calls around IO submission at higher points
in the stack. (I actually have seen it show up in profiles though, it probably
would be worth inlining and slimming down a bit).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/