Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mce: Improve mcheck_init_device() error handling

From: mattieu . souchaud
Date: Wed May 07 2014 - 05:34:18 EST


Ok, thanks, that's better. I'll put your modifications in the patch v3.

----- Mail original -----
De: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Ã: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Mathieu Souchaud" <mattieu.souchaud@xxxxxxx>, bp@xxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-edac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
EnvoyÃ: Mardi 6 Mai 2014 08:27:10
Objet: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mce: Improve mcheck_init_device() error handling


* Luck, Tony <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +err_device_create:
> + /*
> + * mce_device_remove behave properly if mce_device_create was not
> + * called on that device.
> + */
> + for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> + mce_device_remove(i);
>
> grammar comment "s/behave/behaves/"
>
> Though perhaps this is better:
>
> /*
> * We didn't keep track of which devices were created above, but
> * even if we had, the set of online cpus might have changed.
> * Play safe and remove for every possible cpu since mce_device_remove()
> * will do the right thing.
> */

and I guess:

s/cpu since/cpu, since/

?

Thanks,

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/