Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/memcontrol.c: introduce helper mem_cgroup_zoneinfo_zone()

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri May 02 2014 - 18:05:24 EST


On Thu, 1 May 2014 08:54:50 -0400 Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 05:04:26PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 22-04-14 11:59:23, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Sat 19-04-14 07:01:43, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
> > > > introduce helper mem_cgroup_zoneinfo_zone(). This will make
> > > > mem_cgroup_iter() code more compact.
> > >
> > > I dunno. Helpers are usually nice but this one adds more code then it
> > > removes. It also doesn't help the generated code.
> > >
> > > So I don't see any reason to merge it.
> >
> > So should we drop it from mmotm?
>
> Yes, please.
>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > mm/memcontrol.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> This helper adds no value, but more code and indirection.
>
> Cc'd Andrew - this is about
> mm-memcontrolc-introduce-helper-mem_cgroup_zoneinfo_zone.patch
> mm-memcontrolc-introduce-helper-mem_cgroup_zoneinfo_zone-checkpatch-fixes.patch

The patch seemed rather nice to me. mem_cgroup_zoneinfo_zone()
encapsulates a particular concept and gives it a name. That's better
than splattering the logic into callsites.

The patch makes no change to code size but that's because gcc is silly.
Mark mem_cgroup_zoneinfo_zone() as noinline and the patch shrinks
.text by 40 bytes.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/