Re: [PATCH] genirq: Sanitize spurious interrupt detection of threaded irqs

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Austin Schuh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Austin Schuh <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Austin Schuh wrote:
> >>> You originally sent the patch out.  I could send your patch out back
> >>> to you, but that feels a bit weird ;)
> >>
> >> Wheee. Let me dig in my archives ....
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/7/222 in case that helps.
> 
> Did you find the patch?  I didn't see anything go by (but I'm not on
> the main mailing list and didn't find anything with a quick Google
> search.)  It would be nice to not need to run a custom kernel to keep
> my machine running.  I have what is probably a year split between 2
> machines of runtime with the patch applied, and I haven't seen any
> problems with it.

It's on my list, but Easter and traveling did not really help :)

There are a few issues with the patch I need to think through, but
I'll get to it in the next few days.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/