Re: Updated asmlinkage patch v2

[Jan Moskyto Matejka]

> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Did some basic sanity checks with LTO and everything
> > works (still need the three other LTO patches to build)
> 
> Ok, this series looks much better. Thanks,

It seems this series hasn't made it to the torvalds tree yet so the
compiler still issues complaints about __visible static functions.
Should I bring a patch removing the "static" from asmlinkage-annotated
functions, or is this patch the better way? Or have I missed something?

BTW some of the functions have already lost their asmlinkage, see
commit 8783dd3a37a5853689e1a8fa728827a50905b912 ("irqchip: Remove
asmlinkage from static functions") in torvalds tree and also recent
thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/16/453 ("[PATCH] crypto:
sha{256,512}_ssse3 - remove asmlinkage from static functions"), both of
them because "it issues warnings".

MQ

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature