Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf tools: Cache register accesses for unwind processing

From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Mon Apr 28 2014 - 09:24:43 EST


On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:02:55PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> 2014-04-28 (ì), 11:48 +0200, Jiri Olsa:
> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:29:21PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > Hi Jiri,
> > >
> > > 2014-04-17 (ë), 19:39 +0200, Jiri Olsa:
> > > > Caching registers value into an array. Got about 4% speed up
> > > > of perf_reg_value function for report command processing
> > > > dwarf unwind stacks.
> > >
> > > I'm not familiar with the code base, so probably silly questions: Where
> > > does the speed up come from? IOW I don't know what's the difference
> > > between the regs->regs and regs->cached_regs. And does the cached_regs
> > > contain correct values of registers for each frame?
> >
> > the current way register's value is accessed is to get its
> > index in the sample's regs array.. based on register's id
> > and the registers mask
> >
> > so each time you want register value you traverse the registers
> > mask and count reg's index for the sample regs array
> >
> > this patch does this only once for each register (at the time it's
> > first accessed) and cache its value in the array (cache_regs). The
> > cache_mask is used to identify which regs are already cached.
>
> That means it'll get the same value everytime it accesses a register in
> frames in a sample?

right..

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/