Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] arm64: split syscall_trace() into separate functions for enter/exit

From: AKASHI Takahiro
Date: Mon Apr 28 2014 - 05:58:54 EST


On 04/16/2014 10:27 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Akashi,

On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 05:39:06AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
As done in arm, this change makes it easy to confirm we invoke syscall
related hooks, including syscall tracepoint, audit and seccomp which would
be implemented later, in correct order. That is, undoing operations in the
opposite order on exit that they were done on entry.

Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@xxxxxxxxxx>

[...]

+static void tracehook_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs,
+ enum ptrace_syscall_dir dir)
{
+ int scrach;

s/scrach/scratch/

I will fix it.

Although, I'd rather have a variable with a more meaningful name. How about
regno?

OK, I will use regno in the next revision, which I will submit soon.

With that,

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>

Thank you so much,
-Takahiro AKASHI

Cheers,

Will

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/