Re: [PATCH] USB: serial: fix sysfs-attribute removal deadlock

From: Li Zhong
Date: Sun Apr 27 2014 - 21:59:13 EST


On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 09:59 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Li Zhong wrote:
>
> > > No, this isn't self removal. The driver-attribute (not device-attribute)
> > > store operation simply grabs a lock that is also held while the driver
> > > is being deregistered at module unload. Taking a reference to the module
> > > in this case will prevent deregistration while store is running.
> > >
> > > But it seems like this can be solved for usb-serial by simply not
> > > holding the lock while deregistering.
> >
> > I didn't look carefully about this lock.
> >
> > But I'm not sure whether there are such requirements for driver
> > attributes:
> >
> > some lock needs be grabbed in the driver attributes store callbacks, and
> > the same lock also needs to be grabbed during driver unregister.
>
> In this case, the lock does _not_ need to be grabbed during driver
> unregister. The driver grabs the lock, but it doesn't need to.

OK.

>
> > If we have such requirements currently or in the future, I think they
> > could all be solved by breaking active protection after get the module
> > reference.
>
> No! That would be very bad.
>
> Unloading modules is quite different from unbinding drivers. After the
> driver is unbound, its attribute callback routines can continue to run.
> But after a driver module has been unloaded, its attribute callback
> routines _cannot_ run because they aren't present in memory any more.
>
> If we allowed a module to be unloaded while one of its callbacks was
> running (because active protection was broken), imagine what would
> happen...

I don't think the module could be unloaded after we increased the module
reference counter.

Thanks, Zhong

>
> Alan Stern
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/