Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] serial: sc16is7xx

[Charles Coldwell]

On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Charles Coldwell wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, jon@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..ed139f5
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
> 
> > +
> > +/* SC16IS7XX register definitions */
> > +#define SC16IS7XX_RHR_REG		(0x00) /* RX FIFO */
> > +#define SC16IS7XX_THR_REG		(0x00) /* TX FIFO */
> > +#define SC16IS7XX_IER_REG		(0x01) /* Interrupt enable */
> > +#define SC16IS7XX_IIR_REG		(0x02) /* Interrupt Identification */
> > +#define SC16IS7XX_FCR_REG		(0x02) /* FIFO control */
> > +#define SC16IS7XX_LCR_REG		(0x03) /* Line Control */
> > +#define SC16IS7XX_MCR_REG		(0x04) /* Modem Control */
> > +#define SC16IS7XX_LSR_REG		(0x05) /* Line Status */
> > +#define SC16IS7XX_MSR_REG		(0x06) /* Modem Status */
> > +#define SC16IS7XX_SPR_REG		(0x07) /* Scratch Pad */
> 
> Isn't this a lot of duplication?

Actually, the whole thing seems like duplication to me.  The SC16IS7X0 
parts are designed to be 16550-compatible (hence the duplication in the 
register map), and so I would vote for putting the driver into the 
drivers/tty/serial/8250 framework.  There's really not much difference 
between these parts and other 16550 parts except that they are reached 
over the SPI/I2C bus.

-- 
Charles M. Coldwell, W1CMC
"Turn on, log in, tune out"
Belmont, Massachusetts, New England (FN42jj)

GPG ID:  852E052F
GPG FPR: 77E5 2B51 4907 F08A 7E92  DE80 AFA9 9A8F 852E 052F
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/