Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] pinctrl: add Intel BayTrail GPIO/pinctrl support

[Westerberg, Mika]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:25:56AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 04/24/2014 06:58 AM, Westerberg, Mika wrote:
> >>>No, that's my point.  I was expecting the pinmux functions of the
> >>>pinctrl driver are used by ACPI, but apparently they aren't, and
> >>>that's why I'm asking.
> 
> >Which functions?
> 
> The functions in struct pinmux_ops, like get_function_groups.  Will
> these functions ever be called on an ACPI system?

Well, if you have an ACPI system (like normal PC) it is perfectly fine to
have pin controller/mux hardware there which is not dependent at all on
ACPI.

If you happen to have pin controller/mux driver that drives that hardware,
I'm sure your pinmux functions gets called.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/