Re: [PATCH 0/1] init/Kconfig: improve CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE documentation

[Josh Triplett]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 02:07:33PM +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> This patch proposes to warn users about the negative performance
> impact of CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE (compiling with -Os instead of -O2).
> For the moment, we are just advising users not to select this option,
> but extra details would be useful.
> 
> I made some experiments with this option. All of them yielded
> degraded overall boot time. The kernel is smaller and hence is copied
> and started earlier, but the benefits are quickly offset by the
> slower kernel code. Even the total boot time is usually worse
> than with a regular kernel.
> 
> Here are my latest results, on Atmel SAMA5D3 Xplained (ARM),
> Linux 3.10, gzip compressed kernel:
> 
> Timestamp		O2		Os		Diff
> Starting kernel 	4.307 s 	5.593 s 	-94 ms
> Starting init		4.213 s 	5.549 s 	-44 ms
> Login prompt		21.085 s	22.900 s 	+1.815 s 

Did you get the times in the upper two rows transposed row/column?  Based
on the diffs, I'd guess 4.213s goes in Os "Starting kernel", and 5.593s
goes in O2 "Starting init".

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/