Re: [PATCH] sched: update_rq_clock() must skip ONE update

[Steven Rostedt]

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 06:20:36AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: 	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
>  {
>  	s64 delta;
>  

Mike,

If I understand this code correctly, skip_clock_update gets set to one,
where it should skip the next call to update_rq_clock(), but only the
next skip_clock_update(), and after that, it should resume calling it again.
Is that correct?

If so, can we add a comment here stating such. For example:

/*
 * rq->skip_clock_update gets set to "1" to skip the next clock update.
 * The following calls should continue to do the update unless
 * rq->skip_clock_update gets set to "1" again.
 */

?

-- Steve

> -	if (rq->skip_clock_update > 0)
> +	if (rq->skip_clock_update-- > 0)
>  		return;
>  
>  	delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->clock;
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/