Re: [PATCH 00/16] timers/hrtimers: Minor cleanups: Part II

[Viresh Kumar]

On 31 March 2014 19:08, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> And those cleanups make the compiler generate worse code at least on
> x86_64:
>
>    text      data      bss      dec     hex    filename
>    7475      554       0        8029    1f5d   kernel/hrtimer.o
>    7706      554       0        8260    2044   kernel/hrtimer.o
>
> So just removing parameters and return values because you can get the
> same information from a datastructure is not necessarily a good thing.

Hmm.. Nice.

Okay, I will have another look at patches and do this kind of investigation
before sending it next time :) Its been fun going through these frameworks.

How do you want to proceed now? I mean, you will take the other patches
(which don't play with function parameters) as is or want me to send a single
unified patchset with all the pending patches that I have?

Thanks for your support :)

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/