RE: [RESEND] [PATCH V1 2/2] rtc: da9063: RTC driver

[Opensource [Steve Twiss]]

Hi Alessandro,

Just over a week ago I sent a patch for the rtc: da9063: RTC driver file that
added RTC support for the DA9063 currently in the kernel.

I'm not sure if it may have been missed in your inbox
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/11/230

The RTC patch was previously Acked by you here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/7/112


On 11 March 2014 12:27, Lee Jones wrote:

>Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH V1 2/2] rtc: da9063: RTC driver
>> From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add the RTC driver for DA9063.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>How could I have Acked a patch that I've never seen?
>
><snip>
>
>> The original patch is here:
>>  - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/6/346
>>
>> This patch resend is identical to the original patch, except it adds
>> the Acked-by: line from Alessandro Zummo, previously provided here:
>>  - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/7/112
>>
>> Also, it adds an Acked-by line on behalf of Lee Jones, as requested:
>>  - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/10/369
>
>Ah, no. I meant send the set with my Ack applied to the patch I
>actually reviewed.
>
>Alessandro,
>  Are you happy for me to take this set through the MFD tree and send
>  you a pull-request for an immutable branch?
>

I believe that I made a mess of the resend and Ack'ed when I shouldn't
have on Lee Jones's behalf -- but then there was a reply from Lee who
suggested that he could take the patch through despite this.
I think that was his intention.
(Lee: I hope I am not stepping outside the line again!)

If you have time to quickly take another look at this, then I would
appreciate that.

Thank you,
Steve
N‹§²æ¸›yú²X¬¶ÇvØ–)Þ{.nlj·¥Š{±‘êX§¶›¡Ü}©ž²ÆzÚj:+v‰¨¾«‘êZ+€Êzf£¢·hšˆ§~†­†Ûÿû®w¥¢¸?™¨è&¢)ßf”ùy§m…á«a¶Úÿ0¶ìå