[PATCH 3.4 65/99] block: Dont access request after it might be freed

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Fri Mar 07 2014 - 20:13:57 EST


3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 893d290f1d7496db97c9471bc352ad4a11dc8a25 upstream.

After we've done __elv_add_request() and __blk_run_queue() in
blk_execute_rq_nowait(), the request might finish and be freed
immediately. Therefore checking if the type is REQ_TYPE_PM_RESUME
isn't safe afterwards, because if it isn't, rq might be gone.
Instead, check beforehand and stash the result in a temporary.

This fixes crashes in blk_execute_rq_nowait() I get occasionally when
running with lots of memory debugging options enabled -- I think this
race is usually harmless because the window for rq to be reallocated
is so small.

Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
[xr: Backported to 3.4: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Rui Xiang <rui.xiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
block/blk-exec.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/block/blk-exec.c
+++ b/block/blk-exec.c
@@ -49,8 +49,18 @@ void blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct reques
rq_end_io_fn *done)
{
int where = at_head ? ELEVATOR_INSERT_FRONT : ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK;
+ bool is_pm_resume;

WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
+
+ rq->rq_disk = bd_disk;
+ rq->end_io = done;
+ /*
+ * need to check this before __blk_run_queue(), because rq can
+ * be freed before that returns.
+ */
+ is_pm_resume = rq->cmd_type == REQ_TYPE_PM_RESUME;
+
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);

if (unlikely(blk_queue_dead(q))) {
@@ -66,7 +76,7 @@ void blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct reques
__elv_add_request(q, rq, where);
__blk_run_queue(q);
/* the queue is stopped so it won't be run */
- if (rq->cmd_type == REQ_TYPE_PM_RESUME)
+ if (is_pm_resume)
q->request_fn(q);
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/