Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] pinctrl: st: Enhance the controller to manage unavailable registers

[srinivas kandagatla]

Hi Peppe/Maxime,
I missed a comment... :-)


On 07/03/14 09:41, Maxime COQUELIN wrote:
> From: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@xxxxxx>
> 
> This patch adds a new logic inside the st pinctrl to manage
> an unsupported scenario: some sysconfig are not available!
> 
> This is the case of STiH407 where, although documented, the
> following registers from SYSCFG_FLASH have been removed from the SoC.
> 
> SYSTEM_CONFIG3040
>    Output Enable pad control for all PIO Alternate Functions
> and
> SYSTEM_ CONFIG3050
>    Pull Up pad control for all PIO Alternate Functions
> 
> Without managing this condition an imprecise external abort
> will be detect.
> 
> To do this the patch also reviews the st_parse_syscfgs
> and other routines to manipulate the registers only if
> actually available.
> In any case, for example the st_parse_syscfgs detected
> an error condition but no action was made in the
> st_pctl_probe_dt.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
> index 9e9b6ea..d1886b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
> @@ -390,6 +390,19 @@ static const struct st_pctl_data  stih416_data = {
>  	.alt = 0, .oe = 40, .pu = 50, .od = 60, .rt = 100,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct st_pctl_data  stih407_flashdata = {
> +	.rt_style	= st_retime_style_none,
> +	.input_delays	= stih416_delays,
> +	.ninput_delays	= 14,
> +	.output_delays	= stih416_delays,
> +	.noutput_delays = 14,
> +	.alt = 0,
> +	.oe = -1, /* Not Available */
> +	.pu = -1, /* Not Available */
> +	.od = 60,
> +	.rt = 100,
> +};
> +

I think this stih407_flashdata go with the previous patch "pinctrl: st:
add pinctrl support for the STiH407 SoC"

So that this patch just adds new checks to pinctrl-driver and not
stih407 related stuff.

Other than that the patch looks good to me.

>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1583,7 +1612,7 @@ static struct of_device_id st_pctl_of_match[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "st,stih407-sbc-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
>  	{ .compatible = "st,stih407-front-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
>  	{ .compatible = "st,stih407-rear-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> -	{ .compatible = "st,stih407-flash-pinctrl", .data = &stih416_data},
> +	{ .compatible = "st,stih407-flash-pinctrl", .data = &stih407_flashdata},
Same as first comment.
>  	{ /* sentinel */ }
>  };
>  
> 


Thanks,
srini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/