Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Pre-emption control for userspace

[Khalid Aziz]

On 03/06/2014 07:25 AM, David Lang wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Kevin Easton wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 04:51:15PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Anything else?
> >
> > If it was possible to make the time remaining in the current timeslice
> > available to userspace through the vdso, the thread could do something
> > like:
> >
> > if (sys_timeleft() < CRITICAL_SECTION_SIZE)
> >    yield();
> > lock();
> >
> > to avoid running out of timeslice in the middle of the critical section.
>
> but won't the system call result in context switches? According to
> Kevin, even a context switch to another thread and back immediatly is
> bad enough to need to be avoided, so replacing that with the context
> switch to the kernel and back isn't a subtantial win.
>
> David Lang

Using vdso reduces the cost of system call significantly, but as Peter 
pointed out a thread can not really rely upon the number it will get back.

--
Khalid
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/