Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] mmc: sdhci-msm: Qualcomm SDHCI binding documentation

[Josh Cartwright]

Hey Rob-

On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 12:56:22AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +- reg-names: Should contain the following:
> > +       "hc_mem"   - Host controller register map
> > +       "core_mem" - SD Core register map
>
> reg-names should not be required and the order specified by the binding.
>
> > +- interrupts: Should contain an interrupt-specifiers for the interrupts listed in interrupt-names.
> > +- interrupt-names: Should contain the following:
> > +       "hc_irq"     - Host controller interrupt
> > +       "pwr_irq"    - PMIC interrupt
>
> Same for interrupt-names.

Could you elaborate on this a bit?  I can understand not modifying an
existing binding to make {reg,interrupt}-names required, but for
completely new bindings, why is this a problem?

Not allowing a binding to require these properties renders
platform_get_{resource,irq}_byname() useless for drivers which
exclusively use DT for enumeration.  It also makes it impossible to make
a reg entry optional (although, there probably isn't a good usecase for
this).

Thanks,
  Josh

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/