[PATCH 3.11 015/131] ARM: dma-mapping: fix GFP_ATOMIC macro usage

[Luis Henriques]

3.11.10.6 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 10c8562f932d89c030083e15f9279971ed637136 upstream.

GFP_ATOMIC is not a single gfp flag, but a macro which expands to the other
flags and LACK of __GFP_WAIT flag. To check if caller wanted to perform an
atomic allocation, the code must test __GFP_WAIT flag presence. This patch
fixes the issue introduced in v3.6-rc5

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 7f9b179..6e889d0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -1325,7 +1325,7 @@ static void *arm_iommu_alloc_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size,
 	*handle = DMA_ERROR_CODE;
 	size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
 
-	if (gfp & GFP_ATOMIC)
+	if (!(gfp & __GFP_WAIT))
 		return __iommu_alloc_atomic(dev, size, handle);
 
 	/*
-- 
1.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/