[PATCH 3.10 12/97] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: fix: DT ONENAND child nodes not probed when MTD_ONENAND is built as module

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Pekon Gupta <pekon@xxxxxx>

commit 980386d2d6d49e0b42f48550853ef1ad6aa5d79a upstream.

Fixes: commit 75d3625e0e86b2d8d77b4e9c6f685fd7ea0d5a96
       ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: add DT bindings for OneNAND

OMAP SoC(s) depend on GPMC controller driver to parse GPMC DT child nodes and
register them platform_device for ONENAND driver to probe later. However this does
not happen if generic MTD_ONENAND framework is built as module (CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND=m).

Therefore, when MTD/ONENAND and MTD/ONENAND/OMAP2 modules are loaded, they are unable
to find any matching platform_device and remain un-binded. This causes on board
ONENAND flash to remain un-detected.

This patch causes GPMC controller to parse DT nodes when
CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND=y || CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND=m

Signed-off-by: Pekon Gupta <pekon@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
@@ -1391,7 +1391,7 @@ static int gpmc_probe_nand_child(struct
 }
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MTD_ONENAND)
 static int gpmc_probe_onenand_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
 				 struct device_node *child)
 {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/