Re: What is wrong?

From: Leon Pollak
Date: Tue Mar 04 2014 - 04:12:48 EST


Hello, all.

I am really sorry for the silence - I was on the business trip and
returned today.

I will recheck everything and try. Meanwhile, the news are not good: our
guys say that it appears that the additional sync DOES NOT SOLVE the
issue.
I ask for excuse, but as I did not know the exact processing, I was
mistaken and, probably, used already gc-ted unit for tests.

Sorry, again.

BR

On Tuesday 04 March 2014 00:33:25 Brian Norris wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:13:36PM -0600, Andrew Ruder wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 01:22:08PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > Perhaps Richard or Andrew can comment on whether this patch should
> > > help you. But I think JFFS2 on NAND uses write-buffered support
> > > which can be affected by this bug.
> >
> > Definitely sounds like the same issue and I'm kind of glad to see it
> > crop up in another filesystem.
>
> We haven't confirmed that the *patch* actually affects Leon's problem;
> just that if he runs an additional 'sync' it solves his problem.
> Leon, did you get to try the patch?
>
> Anyway, should commit 807612db2f9940b9fa6deaef054eb16d51bd3e00 be
> marked for -stable?
>
> Brian

--
Leon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/