Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bcm2835 tree with the arm-soc tree

[Olof Johansson]

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/02/2014 06:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the bcm2835 tree got a conflict in
>> arch/arm/mach-bcm2835/Kconfig between commits ddb902cc3459 ("ARM:
>> centralize common multi-platform kconfig options") and
>> 0676b21fffd1 ("ARM: bcm2835: enable V6K instead of plain V6") from
>> the arm-soc tree and commit d30fe6272183 ("ARM: bcm2835: Move to
>> mach-bcm directory") from the bcm2835 tree.
>
> Olof, Arnd, Kevin,
>
> Do you want me to rebase the patch that moves
> arch/arm/mach-bcm2835/Kconfig into arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig, or even
> drop it and take it through arm-soc directly? Or, will you just handle
> this when you merge the pull request?

We should be fine handling it when we merge. Conflicts when we merge
in are just fine unless they are excessive, what we want to avoid for
most silly cases is when it'll be exposed all the way up to Linus.
Even then, some of them are ok since it's just how development works.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/