[PATCH 1/1] mm: use macros from compiler.h instead of __attribute__((...))

From: Gideon Israel Dsouza
Date: Sat Mar 01 2014 - 11:03:28 EST


To increase compiler portability there is <linux/compiler.h> which
provides convenience macros for various gcc constructs. Eg: __weak for
__attribute__((weak)). I've replaced all instances of gcc attributes with
the right macro in the memory management (/mm) subsystem.

Signed-off-by: Gideon Israel Dsouza <gidisrael@xxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 3 ++-
mm/nommu.c | 3 ++-
mm/sparse.c | 6 ++++--
mm/util.c | 5 +++--
mm/vmalloc.c | 4 +++-
5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index c01cb9f..9a51286 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <linux/swap.h>
#include <linux/swapops.h>
#include <linux/page-isolation.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>

#include <asm/page.h>
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
@@ -3446,7 +3447,7 @@ follow_huge_pud(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
#else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB */

/* Can be overriden by architectures */
-__attribute__((weak)) struct page *
+__weak struct page *
follow_huge_pud(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
pud_t *pud, int write)
{
diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c
index 8740213..9f823ce 100644
--- a/mm/nommu.c
+++ b/mm/nommu.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/audit.h>
#include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>

#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/tlb.h>
@@ -459,7 +460,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vm_unmap_aliases);
* Implement a stub for vmalloc_sync_all() if the architecture chose not to
* have one.
*/
-void __attribute__((weak)) vmalloc_sync_all(void)
+void __weak vmalloc_sync_all(void)
{
}

diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
index 63c3ea5..8cb4bad 100644
--- a/mm/sparse.c
+++ b/mm/sparse.c
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+
#include "internal.h"
#include <asm/dma.h>
#include <asm/pgalloc.h>
@@ -459,9 +461,9 @@ static struct page __init *sparse_early_mem_map_alloc(unsigned long pnum)
ms->section_mem_map = 0;
return NULL;
}
-#endif
+endif

-void __attribute__((weak)) __meminit vmemmap_populate_print_last(void)
+void __weak __meminit vmemmap_populate_print_last(void)
{
}

diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
index a24aa22..992b7d4 100644
--- a/mm/util.c
+++ b/mm/util.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/swapops.h>
#include <linux/mman.h>
#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>

#include <asm/uaccess.h>

@@ -307,7 +308,7 @@ void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm)
* If the architecture not support this function, simply return with no
* page pinned
*/
-int __attribute__((weak)) __get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start,
+int __weak __get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start,
int nr_pages, int write, struct page **pages)
{
return 0;
@@ -338,7 +339,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__get_user_pages_fast);
* callers need to carefully consider what to use. On many architectures,
* get_user_pages_fast simply falls back to get_user_pages.
*/
-int __attribute__((weak)) get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start,
+int __weak get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start,
int nr_pages, int write, struct page **pages)
{
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 0fdf968..7be0a1a 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
#include <linux/kmemleak.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <linux/llist.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
#include <asm/shmparam.h>
@@ -2181,7 +2183,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(remap_vmalloc_range);
* Implement a stub for vmalloc_sync_all() if the architecture chose not to
* have one.
*/
-void __attribute__((weak)) vmalloc_sync_all(void)
+void __weak vmalloc_sync_all(void)
{
}

--
1.8.5.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/