Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: add DMA support for freescale i2c driver

From: Shawn Guo
Date: Thu Feb 27 2014 - 21:14:26 EST


On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 09:39:35PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > @@ -193,6 +216,7 @@ static const struct imx_i2c_hwdata imx1_i2c_hwdata = {
> > .ndivs = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_i2c_clk_div),
> > .i2sr_clr_opcode = I2SR_CLR_OPCODE_W0C,
> > .i2cr_ien_opcode = I2CR_IEN_OPCODE_1,
> > + .has_dma_support = false,
> >
> > };
> >
> > @@ -203,6 +227,7 @@ static const struct imx_i2c_hwdata imx21_i2c_hwdata =
> > { .ndivs = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_i2c_clk_div),
> > .i2sr_clr_opcode = I2SR_CLR_OPCODE_W0C,
> > .i2cr_ien_opcode = I2CR_IEN_OPCODE_1,
> > + .has_dma_support = false,
> >
> > };
> >
> > @@ -213,6 +238,7 @@ static struct imx_i2c_hwdata vf610_i2c_hwdata = {
> > .ndivs = ARRAY_SIZE(vf610_i2c_clk_div),
> > .i2sr_clr_opcode = I2SR_CLR_OPCODE_W1C,
> > .i2cr_ien_opcode = I2CR_IEN_OPCODE_0,
> > + .has_dma_support = true,
>
> So why exactly don't we have a DT prop for determining whether the controller
> has DMA support ?

Using DMA or PIO is a decision that should be made by driver on its own,
not device tree.

Shawn

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/