Re: [PATCH V2] sparse: Allow override of sizeof(bool) warning

[H. Peter Anvin]

I would.

On February 27, 2014 12:22:45 PM PST, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:32 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Quite frankly, this is silly in my opinion, *and* it is not
>guaranteed
>> by C either (read about "trap representations").
>>>
>> Anything that moves data around in a generic fashion.  It can be as
>> simple as:
>>
>>         memcpy(foo, bar, sizeof *foo);
>
>OK. I get it nobody wants a sizeof(_Bool) warning.
>
>I am going to apply this patch.
>
>Should we change the default to off then?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Chris

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/