Re: [PATCH 02/46] kernel: Add prototype definition to include/linux/kernel.h

[Josh Triplett]

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:32:30AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:38:50 +0530
> Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Add prototype declaration to header file include/linux/kernel.h because
> > it is used by more than one file.
> > 
> > This also eliminates the following warning in kernel/panic.c:
> > kernel/panic.c:55:13: warning: no previous prototype for âpanic_smp_self_stopâ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/tile/kernel/smp.c |    1 +
> >  include/linux/kernel.h |    2 ++
> >  kernel/panic.c         |    1 +
> >  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/tile/kernel/smp.c b/arch/tile/kernel/smp.c
> > index 01e8ab2..8b645fd 100644
> > --- a/arch/tile/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/tile/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/io.h>
> >  #include <linux/irq.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >  #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> >  #include <asm/homecache.h>
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > index 196d1ea..c7cee7d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > @@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ struct completion;
> >  struct pt_regs;
> >  struct user;
> >  
> > +void __weak panic_smp_self_stop(void);
> 
> Is __weak required in a prototype? What about the override that is not
> weak.

That's a good question.  It's definitely not required, and should be
dropped.  What I don't know is if it's broken to include it: does it
make the non-weak definition weak?

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/