RE: [PATCH v5 2/3] x86, mpx: hook #BR exception handler to allocate bound tables

From: Ren, Qiaowei
Date: Tue Feb 25 2014 - 08:35:10 EST



> -----Original Message-----
> From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:hpa@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 1:52 AM
> To: Hansen, Dave; Ren, Qiaowei; Thomas Gleixner; Ingo Molnar
> Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] x86, mpx: hook #BR exception handler to allocate
> bound tables
>
> On 02/24/2014 09:27 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >
> > Can you talk a little bit about what the design is here? Why does the
> > kernel have to do the allocation of the virtual address space? Does
> > it really need to MAP_POPULATE? bt_size looks like 4MB, and that's an
> > awful lot of memory to eat up at once. Shouldn't we just let the
> > kernel demand-fault this like everything else?
> >
>
> MAP_POPULATE definitely seems like the wrong thing.
>
Oh. This option should be removed.

Thanks,
Qiaowei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/