Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI / PM: Resume runtime-suspended devices later during system suspend

From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Mon Feb 24 2014 - 15:58:39 EST


On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Runtime-suspended devices are resumed during system suspend by
> pci_pm_prepare() for two reasons: First, because they may need
> to be reprogrammed in order to change their wakeup settings and,
> second, because they may need to be operatonal for their children
> to be successfully suspended. That is a problem, though, if there
> are many runtime-suspended devices that need to be resumed this
> way during system suspend, because the .prepare() PM callbacks of
> devices are executed sequentially and the times taken by them
> accumulate, which may increase the total system suspend time quite
> a bit.
>
> For this reason, move the resume of runtime-suspended devices up
> to the next phase of device suspend (during system suspend), except
> for the ones that have power.ignore_children set. The exception is
> made, because the devices with power.ignore_children set may still
> be necessary for their children to be successfully suspended (during
> system suspend) and they won't be resumed automatically as a result
> of the runtime resume of their children.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>

You can merge these two via your tree if you want. I don't have any
changes queued up for pci-driver.c.

Bjorn

> ---
> drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> @@ -616,15 +616,11 @@ static int pci_pm_prepare(struct device
> int error = 0;
>
> /*
> - * PCI devices suspended at run time need to be resumed at this
> - * point, because in general it is necessary to reconfigure them for
> - * system suspend. Namely, if the device is supposed to wake up the
> - * system from the sleep state, we may need to reconfigure it for this
> - * purpose. In turn, if the device is not supposed to wake up the
> - * system from the sleep state, we'll have to prevent it from signaling
> - * wake-up.
> + * Devices having power.ignore_children set may still be necessary for
> + * suspending their children in the next phase of device suspend.
> */
> - pm_runtime_resume(dev);
> + if (dev->power.ignore_children)
> + pm_runtime_resume(dev);
>
> if (drv && drv->pm && drv->pm->prepare)
> error = drv->pm->prepare(dev);
> @@ -654,6 +650,16 @@ static int pci_pm_suspend(struct device
> goto Fixup;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * PCI devices suspended at run time need to be resumed at this point,
> + * because in general it is necessary to reconfigure them for system
> + * suspend. Namely, if the device is supposed to wake up the system
> + * from the sleep state, we may need to reconfigure it for this purpose.
> + * In turn, if the device is not supposed to wake up the system from the
> + * sleep state, we'll have to prevent it from signaling wake-up.
> + */
> + pm_runtime_resume(dev);
> +
> pci_dev->state_saved = false;
> if (pm->suspend) {
> pci_power_t prev = pci_dev->current_state;
> @@ -808,6 +814,14 @@ static int pci_pm_freeze(struct device *
> return 0;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * This used to be done in pci_pm_prepare() for all devices and some
> + * drivers may depend on it, so do it here. Ideally, runtime-suspended
> + * devices should not be touched during freeze/thaw transitions,
> + * however.
> + */
> + pm_runtime_resume(dev);
> +
> pci_dev->state_saved = false;
> if (pm->freeze) {
> int error;
> @@ -915,6 +929,9 @@ static int pci_pm_poweroff(struct device
> goto Fixup;
> }
>
> + /* The reason to do that is the same as in pci_pm_suspend(). */
> + pm_runtime_resume(dev);
> +
> pci_dev->state_saved = false;
> if (pm->poweroff) {
> int error;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/