Re: [patch/rfc] perf on raspberry-pi without overflow interrupt

[Vince Weaver]

On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Will Deacon wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 05:45:04AM +0000, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > > Yeah I suppose we could do something like that. Maybe something like:
> > > 
> > > # cat /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/flags
> > > int precise filter
> > 
> > wouldn't that violate the "one value per file" rule?
> > 
> > I guess we could also stick it in the mmap page somewhere, as tools like 
> > PAPI already have to check there for things like rdpmc support.
> > 
> > 
> > Anyway, here's a first pass at a generic fix for this issue.  I'm sure the 
> > code is pretty horrible, I don't usually mess with the perf code at this 
> > level.  I haven't tested yet as it touched enough files that the rasp-pi 
> > is going to take a few hours to finish compiling.
> > 
> > Am I on the right track, or totally off here?
> 
> Where did we get to with this? If the generic changes are going to take some
> time, I'm happy to take a temporary (non-invasive) fix in the ARM backend while
> you sort out the core.

OK, let me revisit the patches.  The last set of generic ones I sent out 
actually was broken on ARM and I've been meaning to straighten things out 
and send a proper follow up patch set but got distracted by other perf 
related issues.

Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/