Re: [PATCH] pciehp: Display the link state change reporting capability

From: Rajat Jain
Date: Fri Feb 14 2014 - 16:40:18 EST


Hello Bjorn,

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> With recent addition of Link state change based hot-plug, it makes
>> sense to display this capability in dbg_ctrl() addition to others.
>>
>> (Also move the call to dbg_ctrl() further down untill after the value
>> is populated in ctrl->link_active_reporting)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatjain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This is fine as it is, but I'd like to get rid of dbg_ctrl()
> altogether someday. I made pcie_init() more verbose with afe2478f2e3f
> ("PCI: pciehp: Announce slot capabilities (slot #, button, LEDs,
> etc)"), and it does include the PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_DLLLARC info.
>
> Is there anything important left in dbg_ctrl() that we don't already
> print elsewhere? The PCI core prints the vendor/device and BAR info.
> Of course, we don't print the entire capabilities/status/control words
> anywhere else. Is that important?

No, there doesn't seem a good use for it today. It all changes a short
while after it gets printed anyway.


>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
>> index da4b020..cbe8e924 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
>> @@ -747,6 +747,8 @@ static inline void dbg_ctrl(struct controller *ctrl)
>> EMI(ctrl) ? "yes" : "no");
>> ctrl_info(ctrl, " Command Completed : %3s\n",
>> NO_CMD_CMPL(ctrl) ? "no" : "yes");
>> + ctrl_info(ctrl, " Link Change Reporting: %3s\n",
>> + ctrl->link_active_reporting ? "yes" : "no");
>> pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, &reg16);
>> ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot Status : 0x%04x\n", reg16);
>> pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, &reg16);
>> @@ -771,7 +773,6 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev)
>> ctrl->slot_cap = slot_cap;
>> mutex_init(&ctrl->ctrl_lock);
>> init_waitqueue_head(&ctrl->queue);
>> - dbg_ctrl(ctrl);
>> /*
>> * Controller doesn't notify of command completion if the "No
>> * Command Completed Support" bit is set in Slot Capability
>> @@ -784,10 +785,9 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev)
>>
>> /* Check if Data Link Layer Link Active Reporting is implemented */
>> pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &link_cap);
>> - if (link_cap & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_DLLLARC) {
>> - ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "Link Active Reporting supported\n");
>> + if (link_cap & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_DLLLARC)
>> ctrl->link_active_reporting = 1;
>> - }
>> + dbg_ctrl(ctrl);
>>
>> /* Clear all remaining event bits in Slot Status register */
>> pcie_capability_write_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA,
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/