Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] allow preemption in alloc and free _buffer_head

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Fri Feb 14 2014 - 07:54:07 EST


* Nicholas Mc Guire | 2014-02-10 16:37:59 [+0100]:

>2a) premption induced race in __this_cpu_dec
> T1 dec:start
> T2 dec
> T1 dec:end
>
>__this_cpu_dec
> -> __this_cpu_sub
> -> __this_cpu_add
> -> __this_cpu_add_#
> -> __this_cpu_generic_to_op
> -> __this_cpu_ptr += val
>
>
>so we end up with the possibilities of
> T1 load
> T2 load
> T2 store
> T1 store
>and the increment provided by T2 would be lost. The result of which
>is that reaching the buffer_heads_over_limit threshold in recalc_bh_state

I don't like this very much. __this_cpu_inc() is not atomic as you say
and without the locking that is provided by preempt_disable() it might
lose one store in inc or dec direction. This error will never be
corrected again. That code path looks very short unless you have 4096
CPUs.

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/