Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dp83640: Get pin and master/slave configuration from DT

[Stefan Sørensen]

On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 21:19 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > +- dp83640,slave: If present, this phy will be slave to another dp83640
> > +  on the same mdio bus.
> 
> Wouldn't it be more natural to have one "dp83640,master" property
> rather than multiple slave properties?

I wanted to keep the common case of a single phy simple, i.e. no need to
specify any master/slave properties. 

> Most of these pr_err lines are a bit _way_ too long for coding style.

I will fix that in the next version.

Stefan


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/