[PATCH 3.12 049/107] dm thin: initialize dm_thin_new_mapping returned by get_next_mapping

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Tue Feb 11 2014 - 15:13:01 EST


3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 16961b042db8cc5cf75d782b4255193ad56e1d4f upstream.

As additional members are added to the dm_thin_new_mapping structure
care should be taken to make sure they get initialized before use.

Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
drivers/md/dm-thin.c | 17 ++++++-----------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
@@ -760,13 +760,17 @@ static int ensure_next_mapping(struct po

static struct dm_thin_new_mapping *get_next_mapping(struct pool *pool)
{
- struct dm_thin_new_mapping *r = pool->next_mapping;
+ struct dm_thin_new_mapping *m = pool->next_mapping;

BUG_ON(!pool->next_mapping);

+ memset(m, 0, sizeof(struct dm_thin_new_mapping));
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&m->list);
+ m->bio = NULL;
+
pool->next_mapping = NULL;

- return r;
+ return m;
}

static void schedule_copy(struct thin_c *tc, dm_block_t virt_block,
@@ -778,15 +782,10 @@ static void schedule_copy(struct thin_c
struct pool *pool = tc->pool;
struct dm_thin_new_mapping *m = get_next_mapping(pool);

- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&m->list);
- m->quiesced = 0;
- m->prepared = 0;
m->tc = tc;
m->virt_block = virt_block;
m->data_block = data_dest;
m->cell = cell;
- m->err = 0;
- m->bio = NULL;

if (!dm_deferred_set_add_work(pool->shared_read_ds, &m->list))
m->quiesced = 1;
@@ -849,15 +848,12 @@ static void schedule_zero(struct thin_c
struct pool *pool = tc->pool;
struct dm_thin_new_mapping *m = get_next_mapping(pool);

- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&m->list);
m->quiesced = 1;
m->prepared = 0;
m->tc = tc;
m->virt_block = virt_block;
m->data_block = data_block;
m->cell = cell;
- m->err = 0;
- m->bio = NULL;

/*
* If the whole block of data is being overwritten or we are not
@@ -1055,7 +1051,6 @@ static void process_discard(struct thin_
m->data_block = lookup_result.block;
m->cell = cell;
m->cell2 = cell2;
- m->err = 0;
m->bio = bio;

if (!dm_deferred_set_add_work(pool->all_io_ds, &m->list)) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/