[PATCH V1] da9052: ONKEY: use correct register bit for key status

From: Anthony Olech <anthony.olech.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Feb 11 2014 - 11:11:13 EST


The wrong register bit of the DA9052/3 PMIC registers was
used to determine the status on the ONKEY.

Signed-off-by: Anthony Olech <anthony.olech.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen <david.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---

This patch is relative to linux-next repository tag next-20140206

The bug that this patch fixes affects only the DA9052 ONKEY driver.

The problem was detected whilst running a scripted set of functional
regression tests whilst investigating a different problem.

This patch has been test compiled on an amd64 server for both x86
and arm targets.

This patch has been spot verified using an SMDK6410 platform
fly-wired to a Dialog da9053 EVB.

drivers/input/misc/da9052_onkey.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/da9052_onkey.c b/drivers/input/misc/da9052_onkey.c
index 1f695f2..7e78334 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/da9052_onkey.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/da9052_onkey.c
@@ -27,19 +27,23 @@ struct da9052_onkey {

static void da9052_onkey_query(struct da9052_onkey *onkey)
{
- int key_stat;
+ int ret, key_stat;

- key_stat = da9052_reg_read(onkey->da9052, DA9052_EVENT_B_REG);
- if (key_stat < 0) {
+ ret = da9052_reg_read(onkey->da9052, DA9052_STATUS_A_REG);
+ if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(onkey->da9052->dev,
- "Failed to read onkey event %d\n", key_stat);
+ "Failed to read onkey event err=%d\n", ret);
+ key_stat = false;
} else {
/*
* Since interrupt for deassertion of ONKEY pin is not
* generated, onkey event state determines the onkey
* button state.
*/
- key_stat &= DA9052_EVENTB_ENONKEY;
+ if (ret & DA9052_STATUSA_NONKEY)
+ key_stat = false;
+ else
+ key_stat = true;
input_report_key(onkey->input, KEY_POWER, key_stat);
input_sync(onkey->input);
}
--
end-of-patch for da9052: ONKEY: use correct register bit for key status V1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/