Re: [PATCH -mm v15 00/13] kmemcg shrinkers

From: Vladimir Davydov
Date: Tue Feb 11 2014 - 10:15:49 EST


Hi Michal, Johannes, David,

Could you please take a look at this if you have time? Without your
review, it'll never get committed.

Thank you.

On 02/05/2014 10:39 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the 15th iteration of Glauber Costa's patch-set implementing slab
> shrinking on memcg pressure. The main idea is to make the list_lru structure
> used by most FS shrinkers per-memcg. When adding or removing an element from a
> list_lru, we use the page information to figure out which memcg it belongs to
> and relay it to the appropriate list. This allows scanning kmem objects
> accounted to different memcgs independently.
>
> Please note that this patch-set implements slab shrinking only when we hit the
> user memory limit so that kmem allocations will still fail if we are below the
> user memory limit, but close to the kmem limit. I am going to fix this in a
> separate patch-set, but currently it is only worthwhile setting the kmem limit
> to be greater than the user mem limit just to enable per-memcg slab accounting
> and reclaim.
>
> The patch-set is based on top of v3.14-rc1-mmots-2014-02-04-16-48 (there are
> some vmscan cleanups that I need committed there) and organized as follows:
> - patches 1-4 introduce some minor changes to memcg needed for this set;
> - patches 5-7 prepare fs for per-memcg list_lru;
> - patch 8 implement kmemcg reclaim core;
> - patch 9 make list_lru per-memcg and patch 10 marks sb shrinker memcg-aware;
> - patch 10 is trivial - it issues shrinkers on memcg destruction;
> - patches 12 and 13 introduce shrinking of dead kmem caches to facilitate
> memcg destruction.
>
> Changes in v15:
> - remove patches that have been merged to -mm;
> - fix memory barrier usage in per-memcg list_lru implementation;
> - fix list_lru_destroy(), which might sleep for per-memcg lrus, called from
> atomic context (__put_super()).
>
> Previous iterations of this patch-set can be found here:
> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/16/206 (v14)
> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/9/103 (v13)
> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/2/141 (v12)
> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/214 (v11)
>
> Comments are highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Glauber Costa (6):
> memcg: make cache index determination more robust
> memcg: consolidate callers of memcg_cache_id
> memcg: move initialization to memcg creation
> memcg: flush memcg items upon memcg destruction
> vmpressure: in-kernel notifications
> memcg: reap dead memcgs upon global memory pressure
>
> Vladimir Davydov (7):
> memcg: make for_each_mem_cgroup macros public
> list_lru, shrinkers: introduce list_lru_shrink_{count,walk}
> fs: consolidate {nr,free}_cached_objects args in shrink_control
> fs: do not call destroy_super() in atomic context
> vmscan: shrink slab on memcg pressure
> list_lru: add per-memcg lists
> fs: make shrinker memcg aware
>
> fs/dcache.c | 14 +-
> fs/gfs2/quota.c | 6 +-
> fs/inode.c | 7 +-
> fs/internal.h | 7 +-
> fs/super.c | 44 ++---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 7 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c | 7 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 7 +-
> include/linux/fs.h | 8 +-
> include/linux/list_lru.h | 112 ++++++++++---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 50 ++++++
> include/linux/shrinker.h | 10 +-
> include/linux/vmpressure.h | 5 +
> mm/list_lru.c | 271 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 399 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> mm/vmpressure.c | 53 +++++-
> mm/vmscan.c | 94 ++++++++---
> 17 files changed, 926 insertions(+), 175 deletions(-)
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/