Re: [PATCH v2] ceph: fix posix ACL hooks

From: Al Viro
Date: Mon Feb 03 2014 - 16:44:06 EST

On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:39:26PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:

> Which fs are you talking about? For 9P it *is* a function of inode alone.
> For CIFS there's no wrong dentry to pick - it doesn't have links to start
> with.

Except that apparently it does ;-/ Bugger...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at