Re: [PATCH v2] x86: don't introduce more __cpuinit users in intel_mid_weak_decls.h

From: Paul Gortmaker
Date: Wed Jan 22 2014 - 16:58:18 EST


On 14-01-22 04:50 PM, David Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:34:15PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> Commit 85611e3febe78955a519f5f9eb47b941525c8c76 ("x86, intel-mid:
>> Add Clovertrail platform support") added new instances of __cpuinit
>> usage. We removed this a couple versions ago; we now want to remove
>> the compat no-op stubs. Introducing new users is not what we want to
>> see at this point in time, as it will break once the stubs are gone.
>>
>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Fei Yang <fei.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> [v2: actually include changes to mfld.c as well this time
>>
>> patch will be added to init cleanup series:
>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git/ ]
>>
>> arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h | 4 ++--
>> arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mfld.c | 4 ++--
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h
>> index a537ffc16299..41fe17d0d8ff 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h
>> @@ -14,6 +14,6 @@
>> /* For every CPU addition a new get_<cpuname>_ops interface needs
>> * to be added.
>> */
>> -extern void * __cpuinit get_penwell_ops(void) __attribute__((weak));
>> -extern void * __cpuinit get_cloverview_ops(void) __attribute__((weak));
>> +extern void *get_penwell_ops(void) __attribute__((weak));
>> +extern void *get_cloverview_ops(void) __attribute__((weak));
>> extern void * __init get_tangier_ops(void) __attribute__((weak));
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mfld.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mfld.c
>> index 4f7884eebc14..88b06fcf9959 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mfld.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mfld.c
>> @@ -64,12 +64,12 @@ static void __init penwell_arch_setup()
>> pm_power_off = mfld_power_off;
>> }
>>
>> -void * __cpuinit get_penwell_ops()
>> +void *get_penwell_ops()
>> {
>> return &penwell_ops;
>> }
>>
>> -void * __cpuinit get_cloverview_ops()
>> +void *get_cloverview_ops()
>> {
>> return &penwell_ops;
>> }
>
> You are still missing one:
>
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mrfl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mrfl.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static struct intel_mid_ops tangier_ops = {
> .arch_setup = tangier_arch_setup,
> };
>
> -void * __cpuinit get_tangier_ops()
> +void * get_tangier_ops()
> {
> return &tangier_ops;
> }
>
> Can you amend your patch?

That was fixed in the other patch you already ack'd :)

http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git/tree/x86-don-t-add-new-__cpuinit-users-to-Merrifield-plat.patch

I made the tangier fix a separate patch since it had a separate
introductory commit, and also actually had the section mismatch.

Thanks,
Paul.
--


>
> Br, David Cohen
>
>> --
>> 1.8.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/