Re: [PATCH v8 3/6] MCS Lock: optimizations and extra comments

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Jan 21 2014 - 05:18:32 EST


On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 05:24:28PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> @@ -41,8 +47,11 @@ void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
>
> prev = xchg(lock, node);
> if (likely(prev == NULL)) {
> - /* Lock acquired */
> - node->locked = 1;
> + /* Lock acquired, don't need to set node->locked to 1
> + * as lock owner and other contenders won't check this value.
> + * If a debug mode is needed to audit lock status, then
> + * set node->locked value here.
> + */

Fail in comment style.

> return;
> }
> ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/