Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: select_idle_sibling macro optimize

[Alex Shi]

On 01/16/2014 09:52 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 21:13 +0800, Alex Shi wrote: 
>> Add Mike Galbraith.
>>
>> Any one like to give some comments?
>>
>> On 01/15/2014 10:23 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
>>> If the sd domain just has one group, then we must be caught the
>>> 	i == target later, and then goes to deeper level domain.
>>> So just skip this domain checking to save some instructions.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 +++++
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> index c7395d9..3265fbc 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>> @@ -4196,6 +4196,11 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target)
>>>  	sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, target));
>>>  	for_each_lower_domain(sd) {
>>>  		sg = sd->groups;
>>> +
>>> +		/* skip single group domain */
>>> +		if (sg == sg->next)
>>> +			continue;
> 
> When is that gonna happen?

I had seen this in a Intel platform, you may have both CPU domain and MC
domain layer, because the domain flag is different, then they can not be
merged. and then the CPU domain just has one group.
> 
> -Mike
> 
> 


-- 
Thanks
    Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/